Good Evening,
By Law. By Responsibility. By Protection of the People.
What Gives the U.S. — and Trump — the Legal Right to Act
Overview
- Presidential authority to act internationally derives from U.S. law, constitutional duty, and established international legal frameworks — not personal power.
- When actions target terrorist organizations, transnational criminal networks, and illicit trafficking, they are classified as lawful enforcement and national security actions, not acts of war.
- The objective is protection, stabilization, and order, while preserving sovereignty and avoiding unnecessary conflict.
Key Developments
- Under Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the President is charged with protecting national security and enforcing federal law.
- U.S. statutes and treaties authorize actions to disrupt drug trafficking, terrorism financing, human trafficking, and illicit resource flows.
- Modern enforcement frameworks distinguish criminal networks from nation-states, allowing targeted action without triggering broad military escalation.
- International cooperation and legal alignment reduce the risk of regional destabilization while restoring internal order.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Currency stability follows lawful enforcement and order.
- Lawful Authority: Actions taken under law create predictability — predictability supports trade, banking, and currency confidence.
- Networks, Not Nations: Targeting criminal systems avoids war-driven economic shocks and capital flight.
- Peace Through Control: Disrupting drugs, trafficking, and illicit finance restores internal stability first.
- Order Before Prosperity: Economic normalization follows enforcement and governance, not chaos.
- No Instant Reset: Legal authority establishes conditions for long-term stability, not immediate revaluation.
Implications for the Global Reset
- Pillar 1 – Rule of Law: Financial systems depend on lawful authority, not unilateral force.
- Pillar 2 – Stability Before Value: Currency confidence follows security, enforcement, and governance repair.
Key Takeaway
The right to act comes from lawful duty to protect, not aggression — strength is exercised through restraint, precision, and rule of law.
This is not unilateral power — it is structured enforcement designed to preserve stability, trade, and financial order.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
- U.S. Constitution – “Article II: Presidential Authority and Duties”
- U.S. Department of Justice – “Counter-Terrorism and Transnational Crime Authorities”
- U.S. Department of State – “Use of Force and International Law”
- United Nations – “Counter-Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime Frameworks”
~~~~~~~~~~
Supreme Court and Trump’s Tariffs: What’s Happening and Why It Matters
Legal clarity on executive trade powers could ripple through markets and currencies
Overview
- The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on Friday regarding the legality of sweeping tariffs imposed by President Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
- Prediction markets indicate roughly a 77% probability that the Court may find the tariffs illegal or beyond Congress’s delegated authority.
- Lower courts have already questioned whether the IEEPA allows broad tariffs based solely on executive action.
Key Developments
- Oral arguments raised concerns that emergency powers were applied beyond their original legislative intent.
- A ruling against the tariffs would focus on constitutional limits and legal process, not the efficacy of tariffs as an economic tool.
- Potential outcomes include refund claims for previously collected tariffs and a reshaping of how executive powers may be used in economic policy.
Why It Matters to Currency Holders
Currency and market confidence depend on rule of law and policy predictability.
- Legal Limits on Executive Power: Court review reinforces separation of powers, protecting markets from abrupt policy reversals.
- Trade Certainty: Clear legal authority underpins predictable global trade flows, bolstering currency stability.
- Potential Economic Impact: A ruling against tariffs could affect trade balances, government revenue, and importer liabilities, indirectly impacting currency flows.
- Rule of Law First: Courts determine how authority is exercised — not whether tariffs themselves are economically effective.
Implications for the Global Reset
- Pillar 1 – Legal Clarity: Strengthening checks and balances maintains financial order and preserves confidence in international commerce.
- Pillar 2 – Policy Predictability: Currency holders benefit from predictable trade and tariff regimes that avoid abrupt shocks.
Key Takeaway
A Supreme Court decision against Trump’s tariffs would signal a process- and authority-focused ruling, not a rejection of tariffs as an economic policy. Lawful clarity strengthens long-term stability, even amid short-term uncertainty.
This is not just a legal ruling — it has direct implications for trade flows, currency confidence, and the structure of executive authority.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
- CoinMarketCal — “Supreme Court Tariff Ruling Expectations”
- Wikipedia — “Tariffs in the Second Trump Administration”
- Al Jazeera — “Supreme Court Review and Separation of Powers Analysis”
- Reuters — “Tariff Refund Risks and Economic Impact”
- MarketWatch — “Legal Pathways for Future Tariff Authority”
- Bloomberg — “Trump’s Tariffs Face Supreme Court Scrutiny Amid IEEPA Debate”
~~~~~~~~~~
Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble
Newshound’s News Telegram Room Link
RV Facts with Proof Links Link
RV Updates Proof links – Facts Link
Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX
Follow Fast Facts
Seeds of Wisdom Team™ Website
