The extensive rejection of the general amnesty law and the demands to amend and scrutinize most of its paragraphs were no longer binding on the Speaker of Parliament, who passed the law in a manner defined as illegal, which angered a massive number of MPs who demanded the dismissal of Mahmoud Al-Mashhadani from the presidency of the Legislative Council, specifically on account that some paragraphs of the regulation need to be amended to make sure that the thieves of public money and the killers of the Iraqi humans aren’t blanketed in the paragraphs of the regulation.
Passing the general amnesty regulation in its contemporary shape will push money thieves out of jail, by means of paying off the cash they owe to the authorities, in addition to paying a cash allowance during their sentence, which might be subjects in order to cause multiplied economic and administrative corruption and inspire crime. in line with the law, the proprietor of the robbery of the century, Nour Zuhair, may be included inside the paragraphs of this regulation.
“This regulation carries some paragraphs that increase issues, especially in regards to the discharge of suspicious figures inclusive of Nour Zuhair and others. The definition of a drug consumer within the regulation, which units 50 grams because the restrict for a person, is in violation of worldwide rules and can cause serious criminal loopholes. This quantity may be sufficient to distribute it to many human beings, which creates essential legal weaknesses,” said Duraid Jamil, a member of the parliamentary integrity committee, to Al-Maalouma.
however, Abdul Razzaq al-Dulaimi, a member of the United Anbar Alliance, confirmed to dinaropinions.com that “the vote casting mechanism at the terrorist amnesty regulation is unlawful and represents a farce that the residence of Representatives has no longer witnessed in view that its established order, represented via the Speaker of the residence Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, who used the “parliamentary jack” to cease the balloting session in a manner that violates the law, ignoring the quorum calculation in spite of the objection of dozens of members of the residence to the approval of the law, however al-Mashhadani did no longer pay any attention to the objectors once they refused to vote on passing the regulation in its modern shape,” explaining that “the terrorist amnesty regulation changed into politicized in desire of the progress Bloc headed by means of Mohammed al-Halbousi for electoral purposes on the fee of the blood of the Iraqi people, and its approval granted a “certificates of forgiveness” to thieves of public cash whose palms are stained with blood.”
In a related context, the consultant of the Fatah Alliance, Mukhtar al-Moussawi, advised /dinaropinions.com/ that “Al-Mashhadani, the parliament, changed into angry and in a anxious psychological kingdom due to the sturdy stress from the political blocs, and within handiest five mins he hit the hammer and announced that the legal guidelines were voted on, however in reality the vote had now not taken location. He become extra enthusiastic than the blocs, and eighty percent of the parliament contributors did not agree, which induced the representatives to accumulate extra than 100 signatures to brush aside the speaker of the council, especially due to the fact that what befell become unlawful.”
Member of the Parliamentary criminal Committee, Raed Al-Maliki, showed that “the action of Parliament Speaker Mahmoud Al-Mashhadani in holding a vote on three legal guidelines in preferred is unconstitutional and violates the inner rules of the house of Representatives and is a risky precedent, as the presidency devoted a violation with the aid of skipping the paragraph on balloting on the legal guidelines, and the individuals of the house objected to moving from one paragraph to some other, and what came about was a defect within the quorum, as the prison quorum became now not finished to vote on the legal guidelines because of the MPs’ objection to the overall amnesty law, which brought on a number of MPs to go to court docket to assignment the Parliament consultation.